Originally posted by Alternate_Ego:Not all guys are jerks, but it's because of those jerks, all guys appear to be bad. Inner beauty is something they should really see for themselves. Not by knowing it through others. Fat or Slim, Handsome or Ugly, You're going to perish one day, lol. Live life as it is.
so what's the definition of life, could you elaborate,
and i will say, well said, your post
The theory of attractions is very much based on darwinism. It is an age old theory where the alpha male would want to look for the alpha woman to mate with thus producing more alpha babies with the best genes from both side. That was what Hitler tried to do during the world war.
In olden days, the alpha males were determined by their physical poweress and athletics ability. This is based on the theory of survivability. A man who has such qualities would be one who can hunt better and bring more food home.
Base on current society context, the alpha male is most of the time firstly determined by his success in his career or potential in his career and then secondly by looks. This is again based on the theory of survivability. A male with a good career is most probably one with some brain matter in him. But make no mistake he could just be a lucky man.
This is also one reason why geeks and nerds are becoming the new epitome of the alpha male nowadays. They have better earning potential. But this is true till maybe 10 years ago. Women nowadays are very much able to provide for themselves and in some cases even able to provide for their male counterparts. But sadly most men has yet to accept this fact. A women who is still looking for a provider in men would be considered as "conservative" 30 years from now. The modern women tends to look out for an attractive male in this case since the need for a provider is not so important now. This would be the case of genetics working on them without their knowledge. A good looking male would be one where their investments, or "eggs", would be carefully utilized for an alpha offspring.
Now when it comes to man, like I said we have yet to learn or rather evolved and tend to look out for beautiful women to spread our seeds with. It is actually time to look out for other qualities in a woman when we choose our mate. Characteristics that makes a woman unique from others like intelligence, maturity, motherlyness and of course financial security should be what we need to look out for. These characteristics are actually what would make a good mother for our offsprings to grow up with. They will grow up to be great adults.
So what should man be doing now? Like I said, the roles are more or less reversed. Earning more money is just not enough nowadays. The women can jolly well do that themselves. Man should start looking good to attract these capable women into their lives. Of course some wit and intelligence would help with communication on their level. So let's not laugh at the "toyboy" next time. They might possibly be the next modern man!
Originally posted by Callan:The theory of attractions is very much based on darwinism. It is an age old theory where the alpha male would want to look for the alpha woman to mate with thus producing more alpha babies with the best genes from both side. That was what Hitler tried to do during the world war.
In olden days, the alpha males were determined by their physical poweress and athletics ability. This is based on the theory of survivability. A man who has such qualities would be one who can hunt better and bring more food home.
Base on current society context, the alpha male is most of the time firstly determined by his success in his career or potential in his career and then secondly by looks. This is again based on the theory of survivability. A male with a good career is most probably one with some brain matter in him. But make no mistake he could just be a lucky man.
This is also one reason why geeks and nerds are becoming the new epitome of the alpha male nowadays. They have better earning potential. But this is true till maybe 10 years ago. Women nowadays are very much able to provide for themselves and in some cases even able to provide for their male counterparts. But sadly most men has yet to accept this fact. A women who is still looking for a provider in men would be considered as "conservative" 30 years from now. The modern women tends to look out for an attractive male in this case since the need for a provider is not so important now. This would be the case of genetics working on them without their knowledge. A good looking male would be one where their investments, or "eggs", would be carefully utilized for an alpha offspring.
Now when it comes to man, like I said we have yet to learn or rather evolved and tend to look out for beautiful women to spread our seeds with. It is actually time to look out for other qualities in a woman when we choose our mate. Characteristics that makes a woman unique from others like intelligence, maturity, motherlyness and of course financial security should be what we need to look out for. These characteristics are actually what would make a good mother for our offsprings to grow up with. They will grow up to be great adults.
So what should man be doing now? Like I said, the roles are more or less reversed. Earning more money is just not enough nowadays. The women can jolly well do that themselves. Man should start looking good to attract these capable women into their lives. Of course some wit and intelligence would help with communication on their level. So let's not laugh at the "toyboy" next time. They might possibly be the next modern man!
there we go again with the theory-.-
Originally posted by A.T.R:there we go again with the theory-.-
Hmm....so let me know what is wrong with my theory.
p.s. I'm actually trying to prove that I'm a geek so that more women will want to have sex with me.
there is no such thing as best gene in the world, because one person cannot gather all the best gene in the world. If one is good in liturature, he probably is bad in atheltics.
It's the tone of those racist, thinking some race have better gene than others, once you are told you have inferior gene, you have nothing you can do, because gene is predetermine,
gene is only string of number of sth that no one understand,
You cannot say a ugly looking guy is inferior, you can only say he is less attractive.And maybe he is ugly in a cute way, and can attract some category of gal.
Originally posted by rokkie:there is no such thing as best gene in the world, because one person cannot gather all the best gene in the world. If one is good in liturature, he probably is bad in atheltics.
It's the tone of those racist, thinking some race have better gene than others, once you are told you have inferior gene, you have nothing you can do, because gene is predetermine,
gene is only string of number of sth that no one understand,
You cannot say a ugly looking guy is inferior, you can only say he is less attractive.And maybe he is ugly in a cute, and can attract some category of gal.
Please talk to me in terms of scientific terms. Have you heard of the bell curve? Please google it before you say this.
I agree that there is no perfect gene, but a good mixture would be possible. It has been proven by genetic engineering and that is one big slab of papers I can use to show truth in what I say.
I'm not saying a ugly guy is inferior, I'm saying he is unattractive. Whatever gal he can attract is not really an issue here. It is if he is really the guy that the gal wants.
darwinism deal with evolutions, he said sth like survive the fittest,so how we should understand this, are we surviving, are we the fittest, i will not say i am the fittest, so this means i am dying?
Originally posted by rokkie:darwinism deal with evolutions, he said sth like survive the fittest,so how we should understand this, are we surviving, are we the fittest, i will not say i am the fittest, so this means i am dying?
Ok....actually I log off already. But after I read this I just have to come back.
Spend a couple of days to read up on darwinism to understand what I'm really talking about before you actually TRY to debate with me on this.
Originally posted by Callan:Please talk to me in terms of scientific terms. Have you heard of the bell curve? Please google it before you say this.
I agree that there is no perfect gene, but a good mixture would be possible. It has been proven by genetic engineering and that is one big slab of papers I can use to show truth in what I say.
I'm not saying a ugly guy is inferior, I'm saying he is unattractive. Whatever gal he can attract is not really an issue here. It is if he is really the guy that the gal wants.
yes, although once i am a engineering student too, but i really don't know what's the scientific term, i only know how to talk in human term,
Bell curve i have not heard it at all, forgive my ignorance,
if you say some one is unattractive, compare to someone attractive, i think the guys attractive can attract more gal, but if we are talking about marriage how many girls do we need to attract, i will say not many, and i think those who can attact alot gal, will not have a good marriage, if we are talking about marriage, not extra marital affair.
God is mercy, just like your mother, not matter how many child she have, she will treat them the same.
So i guess, fertility, is always the top or second top concern, for women to choose their mate, just like alot guys trying to prove their dick is big, display their fertility conciously or subconciously.
but i guess, after many of these, as a human what should we compete, is not who have big dick , nuts, it's the meaningfullness and contentment, come to this part i better not to use the word compete,
self contentment or meaningfullness, is not predetermined, it's really up to each of you.
And the understanding of life always helping you solve any problem in relationship, or build relationship.
So i guess Darvinism is not universally true, it have been proved wrong somehow, but i don't know exactly how, again, my ignorance,
I guess, what you said, probably ignore the importance of spirituality, anyway human is not ape, just attract female by fertility, human have more width and depth than apes,
ps, i never heard of hilter is infuluence by darwinism for committing war crime,i think at least he is more infuluence by machiavellianism,
Originally posted by Callan:Hmm....so let me know what is wrong with my theory.
p.s. I'm actually trying to prove that I'm a geek so that more women will want to have sex with me.
i dun even noe wad you're trying to prove dude!!!!and i dun even wanna noe whether you're geek or not....just tat ur post is wordy...lols
Originally posted by A.T.R:
i dun even noe wad you're trying to prove dude!!!!and i dun even wanna noe whether you're geek or not....just tat ur post is wordy...lols
He meant using his own way to court women. Rather , he believes that nerdy guys might be able to attract gals easier , which i beg to differ.
errrr..... dont know wat to say already~~
Just a quick question....may I know the age of you guys and the circle of women you normally mix with? I think this is the reason for the differing views.
Why not let some of the ladies share their views? Like I said, Man has been quite reluctant to accept some facts for awhile.
Originally posted by lover~~:i dont understand why most of the guys cant accept gals who r fat or chubby?? it's not that they wanted way, i mean they also would like to slim down, but everybody got their own problems.. Why guys cant accept the inner beauty of chubby gals?? And sometimes friends around me, if they see a chubby gal hanging out with a handsome guy, holding hands or wat, the way they look at them is like "how can it be??" "How can that guy like that fat woman?" "Muz be that gal is rich so that guy willing to accpet her!" Why ppl have to use this kind thought?? I really doesnt understand~~
May be anyone of u know??
i like i love how ar
am i weird
inner beauty
but guys don't know that...the more fat reserves the easier it is for the baby to get food and nutrients...baby will be healthier
Originally posted by fairlady_xoxo:but guys don't know that...the more fat reserves the easier it is for the baby to get food and nutrients...baby will be healthier
lol~ yes yes....it is somewhat very true...but that is why woman gain fats in the body during pregnacy right?
It depends on individual's preference. Some like it, and some don't. For example, some men prefer their gf to have big boobs, some prefer skinny women, some prefer big buttock, etc ...
Originally posted by Chipperboy:It depends on individual's preference. Some like it, and some don't. For example, some men prefer their gf to have big boobs, some prefer skinny women, some prefer big buttock, etc ...
I like a nice cute tight butt. I'm a butt man!
as for me look for inner beauty, nice smile and looks ok
the rest do not matter much cos we will grow old together
i like fat
why noah recently mouth so sweet one ah
天啊�The topics these days are driving me nuts.....
Seems like most of the guys here like fat or chubby girls huh.. Then how come fat girls are still complaining that no guys like them?