WHy DO the government want to control us from smoking?
All my oversea friends say OUR GOVERNMENT IS OUR FATHER>
IT oversees our MONEY.
IT OVERSEES our TRANSPORT, ELECTRICITY, GAS, WATER, HOUSING, TELEPHONE, OIL.
IT OVERSEE GEYLANG. YOU MUST FUCK AT THE CORRECT PLACE.
IT REMIND US TO GO UPGRADE OURSELF
IT FORCE US TO WORK DILIGENTLY.
I am really FED UP guys. U feeling the same. Show them when election. AGREE>
Originally posted by Itedino:WHy DO the government want to control us from smoking?
All my oversea friends say OUR GOVERNMENT IS OUR FATHER>
IT oversees our MONEY.
IT OVERSEES our TRANSPORT, ELECTRICITY, GAS, WATER, HOUSING, TELEPHONE, OIL.
IT OVERSEE GEYLANG. YOU MUST FUCK AT THE CORRECT PLACE.
IT REMIND US TO GO UPGRADE OURSELF
IT FORCE US TO WORK DILIGENTLY.
I am really FED UP guys. U feeling the same. Show them when election. AGREE>
you r still a small boy to them, still duno how to behave
cigarettes are pure death.
I'm not pro-PAP but some things u mention are instead the "pros" they had done..
Why DO the government want to control us from smoking?
Ans: Coz smoking make u die faster, and make ur surrounding people die even faster. Think of others...
All my oversea friends say OUR GOVERNMENT IS OUR FATHER
Ans: This 1 i nothing to say.. but i only got 1 father, which is my father =)
IT oversees our MONEY.
Ans: Ya, if not those poor illegible old grandpa and grandma wont get their money back for buying minibonds..
IT OVERSEES our TRANSPORT, ELECTRICITY, GAS, WATER, HOUSING, TELEPHONE, OIL.
Ans: This 1 maybe i agree especially ERP... damn it got deducted four bucks for going town...
IT OVERSEE GEYLANG. YOU MUST FUCK AT THE CORRECT PLACE.
Ans: It reduce rape cases, wad if govt ban prositution, rape cases will sore...
IT REMIND US TO GO UPGRADE OURSELF
Ans: Its ok for not upgrading u noe... the most u diao 1 position for many many years, then got retrench...
IT FORCE US TO WORK DILIGENTLY.
Ans: u can work slackly if u want, then got found out by your boss then get fire =D
dun fed up , you can vote other party during elections =D
Didn't catch the commerical, so what places are banned now?
cant smoke in playgrd, malls or air-conditioned entrance..must be 5metres aways..cant smoke in multi carpark, and market..wow wee hor?
if sg so wan to let ppl quit smoking or prevent from 2nd hand smoke hor..then just ban the selling of cigarette la..ban here ban there in the end is just becoz they wan to make more $$ from..and increasing the number of catcher from 50 to 120..what's next?increase the fine?from 200 - 300?lmaox..and put lesser dustbin so more ppl get caught?
sg gov damn smart lo i must say..i fu le them man...
long live the si gak po!
carpark alot of ppl meh? hmmm...
mus be those mad scholars that think up this stuff...
Smoking ban to be extended to all indoor public places
SINGAPORE : The smoking ban will be extended to all indoor public places and some outdoor places by January 2009.
The National Environment Agency (NEA) will also step up its enforcement efforts.
Some outdoor places, like playgrounds and exercise areas, will be smoke-free next year.
So too will all indoor public areas such as multi-storey and basement
car parks, lift lobbies, non air-con shopping centres and shops.
Many have observed that ash trays demarcate a smoking zone. And so
come January 2009, an ash tray at the entrance of Bras Basah Complex
will probably no longer be there, as the smoking ban has been extended
to include a distance of five metres from the property's entrance or
exit.
Sung Jee Tong, chairman, Bras Basah Complex Merchants' Association,
said: "Hopefully, we can change all the dustbins to those that are
covered. So people do not have the impression that this is a smoking
area."
With more areas becoming smoke-free, NEA will double the number of
enforcement officers from 50 to 120, who will now spend 490 man-hours,
a 300-man-hour increase.
But during the initial phase, they expect to issue more warnings, rather than fines.
Khoo Seow Poh, Director-General Public Health, NEA, said: "In the first
few months, people need to adjust to it. We will always be helping
them, giving more advice. And if need be, in situations where people do
not cooperate, then enforcement has to come in.
"I guess eventually, smokers will have to go to designated smoking
areas to smoke. If most of the public areas are covered under the
smoking ban, then smokers will have to go to (designated smoking areas)
smoke. And there are also wide open areas outside buildings where
smokers can actually go to take their puff."
The smoking ban will also apply to restaurants and bars in the integrated resorts (IRs).
The NEA has not yet indicated if there is a cap to the amount of smoking areas within the gaming halls.
But it said it will be giving its inputs to the IRs on their house rules.
Meanwhile, Resorts World at Sentosa said it is looking at different
options in segregating smoking and non-smoking areas within its casino.
- CNA/ms
should have a designated area for smokers... like smoke room or what like in Japan...
thank you, PAP.
it's time for you guys to quit anyway.. bad for health you know.
yeah yeah, none of my business, yada yada.. but truth is truth.. smoking is bad for health.
Yea! Show them when election
They need to ban smoking totally, not draw lines and say this side cannot smoke and that side can smoke. Total ban is what is needed.
We must be able to listen to campaign speeches without breathing in second hand smoke.
i think its a great move, fully supportive of this move and i'm eagerly awaiting the day they cost 50 bucks a pack and you can only smoke in your own house.
nowadays i'll just walk off even if its my own friend smoking. after all the times i've been forced to take in all that smoke and told i can always be the one to move away if i don't like the smoke i strongly feel smokers should be squeezed into their own corner where they can't disturb anyone.
i agree with the government's move although i myself is also a smoker.
afterall smoking is bad, even if we don care for ourselves, have to care for those ppl near us, always when we smoke.
non-smokers should not be in a position where they have tahan 2nd hand smoke because of ppl like us.
Originally posted by limpper:i agree with the government's move although i myself is also a smoker.
afterall smoking is bad, even if we don care for ourselves, have to care for those ppl near us, always when we smoke.
non-smokers should not be in a position where they have tahan 2nd hand smoke because of ppl like us.
wow. u're the first. =)
respect!!
Originally posted by oldbreadstinks:i think its a great move, fully supportive of this move and i'm eagerly awaiting the day they cost 50 bucks a pack and you can only smoke in your own house.
nowadays i'll just walk off even if its my own friend smoking. after all the times i've been forced to take in all that smoke and told i can always be the one to move away if i don't like the smoke i strongly feel smokers should be squeezed into their own corner where they can't disturb anyone.
ya lor. but my smoking friends are really considerate la. it's all good
ban drinking oso while they're at it pls.
Originally posted by maskedangel:ban drinking oso while they're at it pls.
drinking isn't the problem.. drink driving and drunk fights are the problem.. =)
the harms of smoking is a passive thing.. it occurs directly from smoking.
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:drinking isn't the problem.. drink driving and drunk fights are the problem.. =)
the harms of smoking is a passive thing.. it occurs directly from smoking.
if drinking is banned, there will be no drink driving and drunk fights, right?
drink driving and drunk fights cause immeadiate damage, and cannot be avoided by the public. .
where else, one can siam from the cigg smoke if one chooses to. .. .
lets keep this thread friendly, cos topics like this are flamable
Originally posted by maskedangel:if drinking is banned, there will be no drink driving and drunk fights, right?
drink driving and drunk fights cause immeadiate damage, and cannot be avoided by the public. .
where else, one can siam from the cigg smoke if one chooses to. .. .
lets keep this thread friendly, cos topics like this are flamable
because when you drink, you can choose not to drive, or get into fights (even so, for every 100 person who drinks, maybe 20 gets into a fight, but for every 100 person who smokes, 100 of them poisons their neighbour).
you can't choose not to poison others when you smoke. you just do.
yeah, i'm pretty tired of having to siam because of inconsiderate smokers, so i applaud this move.
anyway, quit la. win win for everyone
the smoker's area in coffeeshops wasn't effective enough meh, wtf
Originally posted by dumbdumb!:because when you drink, you can choose not to drive, or get into fights (even so, for every 100 person who drinks, maybe 20 gets into a fight, but for every 100 person who smokes, 100 of them poisons their neighbour).
you can't choose not to poison others when you smoke. you just do.
yeah, i'm pretty tired of having to siam because of inconsiderate smokers, so i applaud this move.
anyway, quit la. win win for everyone
hmmm. .
another thing to add, drinking does passive damage to your kidneys. . .
quiting is another issue alltogether.
well, i don wanna go on debating for now. .
sorry for the inconvinience caused to non smoker, but seriously, this is just a plot for them to gain more money through increased cigg price and fines imposed. house always win. and now it seems their odds are greater den ever
I heard even market cannot smoke.
Smoking kill yourself and kill others.
I do not mind voting for others if the other is like Obama caliber . At least I think he can really present himself ..
But I do not get to vote at all in my area . All walk over how to vote !!!!
Should smoke lesser ... I can feel my health get worse from it ...