Which is a better choice?
Both are almost at the same instalment. Mazda is 9 years loan and Forte is 10 years loan.
Need some suggestions here.
my family car is a 2006 Mazda 3.
wow. one year old car with only 8k in? that's good.
if i were you, i'd go for the kia. but maybe because i'm sick of the mazda 3 look.
if installment about the same, then it's which car you want for yourself already.....
It's the new FL 2009 version, the Mazda 3 with the smiley face.
Which I thought 8k mileage and price is quite reasonable.
I'll go for the kia, because its brand new, and I'm not a fan of mazda.
i'll go for cerato forte koup.
You will never know what they do to the car during this one year period.....like hard driving, worn brake pads, faulty electronics on and off and etc so best is to send the Mazda to STA for inspection and only commit if the result is A or AA (cant remember) and no issues with chassis, wheel alignment (if out there seems sign of collison) and engine mounts.
But i think new Kia Forte is a better buy as now they give 5 year warranty so they are pretty much confident their parts can hold up well....but for used car hmmm not too sure..
new car is always better than old car, hoho