Second trend i noted is this, using the points provided by the forumer above me
When some companies having unethical or illegal practice are often challenged on these few points
a) lack of products/lack of focus on product selling
b) hard pressure selling
c) unethical refunds policy
d) a backstabbing, nasty culture
etc etc
there were few rebuttal on these few points
instead, people who want to defend their company choose to do so by
a) flaming the person who brought forward their points
b) choose to talk about why people must get rich when the issue is on the unethical behaviour of the management
c) fight on issues on other grounds
for eg. i bring points against your coy, you choose to ask why i like to backstab your company, that i must come out one to one debate so on and so forth
people, who thought they know all abt biz, forget that the marketing ground isnt fought solely on grounds of personal courage, bravery, brute force
coincidentally, these are pretty attractive stuff a lot of scams masterminds like imbue in their poor victims
kinda remind me of the Coliseum games the Roman Emperor organised to divert the people mind away from their poor economic condition...