Having hit $1.42(S$1.80) a litre, unleaded nudged a low of $1.33 (S$1.69)a litre last week. On Tuesday this week, the price cycle fell to a low of just $1.37.--
The alarming outlook suggests home buyers could face mortgage rates of close to 9 per cent early in 2008. Interest rates have risen 11 times since 2001, forcing an increase in standard variable mortgage rates from 6.05 per cent to 8.55 per cent in the last six years of the Howard government.SG can give u 2.6%,mate.
Singapore unleaded at $1.98 per litre. Australian petrol at 10% cheaper not substantial? If you pump full tank $50 in Singapore, you will only pay $45 in Australia. If you pump $50 every week, you will save $260 a year.Originally posted by lionnoisy:Petrol cheaper in Oz.Yes.Not so much....
Having hit $1.42(S$1.80) a litre, unleaded nudged a low of $1.33 (S$1.69)a litre last week. On Tuesday this week, the price cycle fell to a low of just $1.37.--
By Heath Aston and Brad Watts
December 27, 2007 12:00am
2.The alarming outlook suggests home buyers could face mortgage rates of close to 9 per cent early in 2008. Interest rates have risen 11 times since 2001, forcing an increase in standard variable mortgage rates from 6.05 per cent to 8.55 per cent in the last six years of the Howard government.
SG can give u 2.6%,mate.
Dunt just look at the trees and forget the forest.
Originally posted by lionnoisy:My 2 cents..... ferget the contribution to watever CPF and all that crap. Take home in AUD is more than the entire salary package in SG for low - middle income.
[b]Petrol cheaper in Oz.Yes.Not so much....
SG can give u 2.6%,mate.
Dunt just look at the trees and forget the forest.[/b]
Originally posted by maurizio13:
Singapore unleaded at $1.98 per litre. Australian petrol at 10% cheaper not substantial? If you pump full tank $50 in Singapore, you will only pay $45 in Australia. If you pump $50 every week, you will save $260 a year.
2.6% for mortgage in Singapore? Maybe you can direct me to the bank giving these kind of rates? I want to buy more property if the home mortgage is only 2.6%. (Maybe "eagle" was referring to you when he said that arguments are not substantiated by facts and research.)2.i refer to HDB rate.Who say u and i MUST stay in private house
According to DBS, their home mortgage rate is SIBOR + 1.25%. A 12 mth SIBOR is already 2.75%. Therefore DBS mortgage rate being 4%.
http://www.dbs.com.sg/sg/personal/loans/managedmortgage/
http://www.sgs.gov.sg/sgs_data/daily_domestic_interbank_rates.html
Singapore's inflation is poised to hit 4.5% in 2008. Our current inflation this year is what, 2%? So if it hits 4.5%, then our mortgage rate will hit what, 9%?
Do the calculation. Australian salaries less taxes and Singaporean salaries less taxes. Who pays off their housing loan faster?
I don't have the statistics for the average distance travelled by an Australian in a month. Maybe you can provide me with the statistics, else we will border to speculation of "my friend drive 5km a day" and "my friend drive 50km a day" issue.Originally posted by lionnoisy:1.In Oz,cars is almost a must.U guys have told me how nice it is to stay in Landed house in Oz,right?
Besides,u drive much longer in Oz than SG?
So ,10% less in petrol not enough for the above factors.
Ask your friend how many kilo meter they drive in a month.
2.i refer to HDB rate.Who say u and i MUST stay in private house
when HDB is cheap and good.2.6% is a rate if u are citizen
and do not own private property.
Some body in this forum talk about if
we own HDB.What is the meaning of ''owning'' HDB?
U guys just mean holding a Freehold property is actually owning,
but not owning balance of 99 years lease.
Can u tell yourself u are owning balance of 99 years.
This is enough for two generations.
see how you can buy resale flat in SG from S$100,000 to $750,000.
Singapore PR also can buy....
Originally posted by maurizio13:Your calculation of retail staff wages is wrong !!! They do not earn that much !!!
While the government throws away our hard earned money into frivolous acquisition of over-priced companies overseas. The commoners are left with having to pay the price with high levels of inflation, taxes, fees, charges and fines.
Ever wonder why our wages are so depressed, while citizens from other equivalent GDP per capita economies (e.g. Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, etc) can better afford holidays overseas. Their average wages are at least 3-5 times of Singaporeans (e.g. waiters and retail assistant makes AUD 15 to AUD 25 per hour). Singaporeans can only contend with 3rd world standard of living in the future, given the government's policy on letting in more 3rd world workers to push down wages.
The explanation for low wages given by P4P was global competition, seems like competition only applies to Singapore ONLY. But not to countries such as Australia or New Zealand.
P4P lackeys here complain that some of these countries like Australia, New Zealand, etc have high tax structure. But given their wages, they still make more than the average Singaporeans and could afford more despite their high tax structure. Notwithstanding that they do not need to pay for healthcare and basic education.
[b]Singapore:
Income per year: SG$12,000
Income Taxes: 0%
GST: 7%
Spending Power After GST: SG$11,160 [SG$12,000 x 93%]
Australia:
(waiter or retail staff based on 3 times earnings of Singaporean only, not 5 times which is the higher bound)
Income per year: AU$36,000
Income Taxes: up to AU$6,000 = AU$0; AU$6,001 to AU$25,000 = AU$2,850; AU$25,001 to AU$36,000 = AU$3,300
Australia Personal Tax Rates
Total Income Taxes: AU$6,150 [AU$ 0 + AU$ 2,850 + AU$ 3,300]
Income after Income Taxes: AU$29,850
GST: 10%
Spending Power After GST: AU$26,865 [AU$29,850 x 90%]
An average waiter in Australia will have a spending power of AU$26,865, while a Singaporeans waiter will have only SG$11,160. Why do you think when we go for holidays overseas, we can afford less than an equivalent GDP per capita country like Australia or New Zealand.
You do the maths and tell me who is actually better off after personal taxes and GST.
Singaporeans or Australians???
Though Australia might have a higher personal tax structure, but their average wages are 3 to 5 times of Singaporeans. Even after deducting high taxes and GST, they still do end up with more money in the pocket than an average Singaporean. Moreover, they have no need to pay for healthcare and basic education.
Australian Wages
Bartending/waiting tables: $15 - $25 per hour (casual)
Chef: $700 - $800 per week (full time)
Retail sales assistant: $15 - $25 per hour (casual)
Check out operators and cashiers: $500 - $700 per week (full time)
Building/labouring: $650 - $850 per week (full time)
Engineering: $800 - $1500 per week (full time)
Hairdressing: $530 - $650 per week (full time)
Secretarial/administration: $600 - $700 per week (full time)
Child care: $18 - $20 per hour (casual)
[/b]
Short retail hours does not mean that you will only work in one shop.Originally posted by storywolf:Your calculation of retail staff wages is wrong !!! They do not earn that much !!!
Why ... because aust have very short retail hours !!!!
Originally posted by aurigakb:A minor correction
For highly skilled/ high pay work, that is where Singapore is ahead. The pay may or may not be higher in the first place, but the lower taxes, and lower cost of living really comes into play. Taxes start to get pretty scary at this point. Up to almost 50%.
[/b]
Originally posted by maurizio13:
While the government throws away our hard earned money into frivolous acquisition of over-priced companies overseas. The commoners are left with having to pay the price with high levels of inflation, taxes, fees, charges and fines.
Ever wonder why our wages are so depressed, while citizens from other equivalent GDP per capita economies (e.g. Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, etc) can better afford holidays overseas. Their average wages are at least 3-5 times of Singaporeans (e.g. waiters and retail assistant makes AUD 15 to AUD 25 per hour). Singaporeans can only contend with 3rd world standard of living in the future, given the government's policy on letting in more 3rd world workers to push down wages.
The explanation for low wages given by P4P was global competition, seems like competition only applies to Singapore ONLY. But not to countries such as Australia or New Zealand.
P4P lackeys here complain that some of these countries like Australia, New Zealand, etc have high tax structure. But given their wages, they still make more than the average Singaporeans and could afford more despite their high tax structure. Notwithstanding that they do not need to pay for healthcare and basic education.
[b]Singapore:
Income per year: SG$12,000
Income Taxes: 0%
GST: 7%
Spending Power After GST: SG$11,160 [SG$12,000 x 93%]
Australia:
(waiter or retail staff based on 3 times earnings of Singaporean only, not 5 times which is the higher bound)
Income per year: AU$36,000
Income Taxes: up to AU$6,000 = AU$0; AU$6,001 to AU$25,000 = AU$2,850; AU$25,001 to AU$36,000 = AU$3,300
Australia Personal Tax Rates
Total Income Taxes: AU$6,150 [AU$ 0 + AU$ 2,850 + AU$ 3,300]
Income after Income Taxes: AU$29,850
GST: 10%
Spending Power After GST: AU$26,865 [AU$29,850 x 90%]
An average waiter in Australia will have a spending power of AU$26,865, while a Singaporeans waiter will have only SG$11,160. Why do you think when we go for holidays overseas, we can afford less than an equivalent GDP per capita country like Australia or New Zealand.
You do the maths and tell me who is actually better off after personal taxes and GST.
Singaporeans or Australians???
Though Australia might have a higher personal tax structure, but their average wages are 3 to 5 times of Singaporeans. Even after deducting high taxes and GST, they still do end up with more money in the pocket than an average Singaporean. Moreover, they have no need to pay for healthcare and basic education.
Australian Wages
Bartending/waiting tables: $15 - $25 per hour (casual)
Chef: $700 - $800 per week (full time)
Retail sales assistant: $15 - $25 per hour (casual)
Check out operators and cashiers: $500 - $700 per week (full time)
Building/labouring: $650 - $850 per week (full time)
Engineering: $800 - $1500 per week (full time)
Hairdressing: $530 - $650 per week (full time)
Secretarial/administration: $600 - $700 per week (full time)
Child care: $18 - $20 per hour (casual)
[/b]
Everywhere you go, there is bound to be some form of discrimination by a small minority of the population.Originally posted by play_n_play:just back from the holiday in australia, a good place, the only thing i do not like is, the discrimination to asian...
Originally posted by aurigakb:i agree with your statement to a certain extent.
For highly skilled/ high pay work, that is where Singapore is ahead. The pay may or may not be higher in the first place, but the lower taxes, and lower cost of living really comes into play. Taxes start to get pretty scary at this point. Up to almost 50%.
[/b]
A result of the government's policy to import more foreign talents.Originally posted by fishbuff:i agree with your statement to a certain extent.
when job agencies ask for my age, the usual replies were; "we are looking for someone younger."
my IT profession in SG is a goner, dominated by u-know-who.
is there KARMA? I wonder whenever I hear of sad stories like yours.Originally posted by fishbuff:i agree with your statement to a certain extent.
when job agencies ask for my age, the usual replies were; "we are looking for someone younger."
my IT profession in SG is a goner, dominated by u-know-who.
I would like to also consider the cost of living.Originally posted by maurizio13:While the government throws away our hard earned money into frivolous acquisition of over-priced companies overseas. The commoners are left with having to pay the price with high levels of inflation, taxes, fees, charges and fines.
Ever wonder why our wages are so depressed, while citizens from other equivalent GDP per capita economies (e.g. Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, etc) can better afford holidays overseas. Their average wages are at least 3-5 times of Singaporeans (e.g. waiters and retail assistant makes AUD 15 to AUD 25 per hour). Singaporeans can only contend with 3rd world standard of living in the future, given the government's policy on letting in more 3rd world workers to push down wages.
................
[/url]
Govt has a new rule for a period of time.... super contributions for this period will be non taxable.... up to a certain amt i believe its 1m. Recently alot of peeps are hitting $ into super to beat the deadline.Originally posted by maurizio13:But from what I know (I could be wrong), if an Australian contributes $1,000, the government will co-contribute a similar amount into his retirement fund.
Be a blue collar worker and accept cash only..... no taxOriginally posted by reddressman:dear forummers, especially those going or already landed in Aussielando,
what are the legal ways to avoid some of the taxation in aussilando?
if got good ways, I will migrate sooner than you think.